India post office directory

Panwadi So – 394652

Panwadi So uses PIN code 394652 in Tapi district, Gujarat. It is classified as a Post Office and is marked as a delivery office.

Panwadi So post office in Tapi, Gujarat, PIN 394652

Panwadi So is a Post Office using PIN code 394652 in Tapi district, Gujarat. It is marked as a delivery office. It comes under Bardoli Division, Vadodara Region and Gujarat Circle. It shares PIN 394652 with 5 other post office records in this directory. This record also includes validated coordinates and a DIGIPIN.

PIN code394652
Office typePost Office
DeliveryDelivery
DistrictTapi

Postal details

Panwadi So postal information

State / UTGujarat
DistrictTapi
DivisionBardoli Division
RegionVadodara Region
CircleGujarat Circle
DIGIPIN3L4P4CPF88
Coordinates21.126198, 73.392614

API example

Retrieve this PIN through the API

Request PIN 394652 to retrieve the post-office records associated with this PIN code.

API documentation
GEThttps://api.pincodeapi.in/api/v1/pincode/394652
Example request
curl --fail --show-error --max-time 10 "https://api.pincodeapi.in/api/v1/pincode/394652"

Complete language guides are available in the code examples directory. Public limit: 6 API calls per 10 seconds per IP address. If you receive HTTP 429, wait before sending more requests.

Post office name search

Search for Panwadi So with the API

The search endpoint accepts a place or post-office name. This example uses the name shown on this page.

Search endpoint details
GEThttps://api.pincodeapi.in/api/v1/search?q=Panwadi%20So
curl --get "https://api.pincodeapi.in/api/v1/search" --data-urlencode "q=Panwadi So"

Name search can return more than one matching record. Check the returned office name, PIN code, district and state before selecting a result.

Same PIN

Other post offices using 394652

Data transparency

About this postal information

This page is based on processed India Post data, Open Government Data and other publicly available government sources. Postal records can change over time, and some fields may be missing or outdated.